Attorney-client privilege is one of the oldest recognized legal principles in the world and was created to ensure that a client felt secure in sharing sensitive information with their attorney. It also prevents lawyers from testifying about, or being forced to testify about, their client’s statements.
This legal principle protects the confidentiality of communication between a client and an attorney. Typically, this privilege applies when:
Communication can be oral or written. A client may choose to inform an attorney that they can share private communications with those outside of the legal team; however, an attorney cannot do so without permission from the client.
There are exceptions to this rule – if a client informs their attorney that they are planning to commit a crime, especially those that will result in serious injury or death, then the attorney may disclose that information to the appropriate authorities and may be ethically obligated to do so depending on the circumstances.
It is fairly easy to understand when the attorney-client privilege exists between an attorney and a single client. However, this rule becomes more complicated in a corporate setting.
Attorneys who work in an in-house counsel capacity for a corporation could work as sole legal representatives or as part of a large legal team. The job may require the completion of a wide range of legal tasks, including:
Given the number of people who an attorney will interact with on any given day, it can be difficult to determine when attorney-client privilege exists in a corporate setting. Typically, the court views the “client” as the actual corporation, not the individuals that work for the corporation. Simply having an attorney present does not indicate that attorney-client privilege applies, as many attorneys also work in a business capacity. In general, only communications in which the attorney is specifically providing legal advice related to company practices could such communications be considered privileged.
An easy way to make clear that attorney-client privilege does not apply is when the privilege is waived. That can be accomplished in three ways:
Implied waiver occurs when a client places communications “at issue” in litigation. When the communicated information is put forward as a vital part of a case by the client, an implied waiver exists.
For example, if an employee forwards a privileged communication to a thirdparty outside of those involved in the initial communication, that creates an inadvertent waiver.
This is when the client - in the case of a corporation, typically a senior-level employee such as a CEO or COO - indicates that the information may be shared with a third-party.
Here are a few “tests” or best practices that corporate attorneys can use to educate and guide internal clients when it comes to the attorney-client privilege:
If you have any questions regarding attorney-client privilege in a corporate setting, contact Athan Law at (509) 215-4679 to learn more.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this article is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. Every case or situation is unique, and you should consult with a licensed attorney before taking any action. No attorney-client relationship is formed by downloading or reading this article.
Posted February 10, 2023