Schwartz v. King Cnty.

Schwartz v. King Cnty., 200 Wn.2d 231, 245, 516 P.3d 360 (2022) (reversing summary judgment because Schwartz has presented evidence showing a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the bollard is known dangerous artificial latent condition under the exception to Washington’s recreational use immunity statute). 

Disclaimer: The information provided on this article is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. Every case or situation is unique, and you should consult with a licensed attorney before taking any action. No attorney-client relationship is formed by downloading or reading this article.

Posted May 31, 2023

Call Toll Free 888-898-2928
Website made with Invisible Ink
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. We use cookies to provide you with a great experience and to help our website run effectively. x